Pages

Showing posts with label Television. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Television. Show all posts

Friday, November 8, 2013

Once Upon a Time: Rage Edition

My sources say that writing something outside the subject of my NaNoWriMo project still counts towards my monthly goal, and there are some things that need to be said about this week’s episode of Once Upon a Time.  Grievances to be aired, nits to be bloody picked and so on.  I realize, having said this myself before, that UOaT is not a haven for amazing writing or storytelling.  There are some bright spots, don’t get me wrong, but for the most part the scripts are pretty lazy.  Not to mention the CG.  I’ve seen better effects in low budget 80s movies.  Oh yes, spoilers.  If you don’t watch UOaT you probably won’t know what the hell I’m talking about but I’ll try to make it interesting nonetheless.  If you do - SPOILERS.  Spoilers for some incredibly stupid character non-development and the ritual butchering of something very precious to me.

Why do I still watch the show?  For reasons all beginning with “Rumple” and ending with “stiltskin” now that the USS Mulan/Aurora has foundered upon the rocks of tragedy and unrequited love.  Robert Carlyle is a treasure, I love the way he plays the character, and now that he’s in Neverland he gets to be this awesome cross between maniacal past-Rumple and reformed-but-still-ominous Mr. Gold.  Which is where my first nit comes in.  Remember when he first came to Neverland?  He cut off his own shadow.  Sliced it right off his feet, with the Dagger of Resplendent McGuffinry.  And then smirked and sent it off to hide the dagger.  Amazing.  And now he’s wandering around the island, moping around about how he’s a coward and Henry’s his undoing and he misses his son and SO ON until Regina has to come and rescue him from Peter Pan’s shadow.  Mind you, that is some damn artful moping (never leave me, Robert C) but Regina?  The Evil Queen so completely feckless she a) can’t kill a beached mermaid properly, b) locks herself in a perpetual Groundhog Day with happy-ish albeit dopey and ignorant versions of all her enemies, and c) probably leaves the stove on when she leaves the house.  I have feelings about these things.  But even Regina is a goddamn Machiavellian genius compared to some of the other characters on this show, but more on that later.  I like Regina, her character has depth, and she can feast upon the scenery close to a Rump-esque level.  But not quite, because that cannot be done.  I’m happy that they’re teamed up now, because there could be some excellent gender-swapped Oedipal business in the future.  Yes I have a sick mind - is Regina Rumple’s daughter?  I can’t remember.  But my point is, Rumble’s emo behavior over the last few episodes is not working at all.  Be glorious, Rumple!  Sew fear into some hearts, lay waste to some bratty teenagers!  And stop calling your son Bae.  Who the hell gives a kid an awesome name like Baelfire and then calls him Bae?  These are questions that must be answered.

Moving on, all the characters we don’t care about except Hook are fumbling around the island trying to find Henry.  As usual, Charming is being stupid, Snow is being creepy and awkward, and Emma is… well, she didn’t really start out with a full box of crayons.  There’s a bunch of talking, until finally all the characters have to reveal a terrible secret that they would never tell anyone and it turns out to all be boring things that we’ve already figured out.  Snow wants another kid?  Surely you jest.  Even Charming could pick up on that one, or should have been able to.  Emma hoped Neil would be dead so she didn’t have to feel all the feels again?  Shocking.  Charming’s revelation was a little more interesting as he has to tell Snow that he nearly died of stupid and now can’t ever leave Neverland.  But who cares?  This show has been beating us over the head with the idea that nothing else matters because they have each other, so why can’t they just kill Pan and raise a family in Neverland?  So, interesting but not world-shattering in any way.  The only secret that had any real impact was Hook’s, at least in my book.  Not for what it was - we’d all figured out he was just a wounded puppy dog and not a dastardly evilpants a long time ago - but because of what it said about him.  He didn’t weasel about waiting for someone else to go first, he laid out his feelings even though Emma’s baby-daddy was sitting in a cage not too far away whom she’s supposedly still in love with.  Let’s be honest, no one has just one terrible secret they won’t admit to anyone.  I’m pretty sure Hook could have picked any number of things to reveal and kept his interest in Emma strictly of the boffing kind as far as anyone else was concerned.  That look he gave Charming after the dude thanks him for saving his stupid life took the phrase “I didn’t do it for you, mate” and translated it straight into “I want to bang your daughter”.  That look did not say “I want to have a meaningful relationship with your daughter”.  Remember in Saga where Marko needs a secret of Alana’s to power a spell and she gives him “I enjoy the taste of my own breastmilk”?  The point is everyone has tons of secrets, and Hook decided to reveal the one that put him in the most vulnerable position.  At least that’s how I chose to think about it, instead of that its more lazy writing.  Incidentally, if you haven’t read Saga and don’t know what I was talking about up there, leave your computer now and go read Saga.  Do it.  You’re welcome.

Anyways, moving on to the ritual slaughter.  Let me get something out of the way first - I love The Little Mermaid.  Its my second favorite Disney movie after Beauty and the Beast, “Part of Your World” is my go-to karaoke crowd-pleaser, I watched it every single day for a month when it came out on VHS, and I can nearly recite the entire movie from memory.  I sometimes sneak “Dinglehopper” into normal conversation.  I also know the specifics of the original, far less happy, Hans Christian Anderson tale.  I LOVE THIS SHIT ALRIGHT?  And what they did with Ariel’s story in UOaT  was just horrifying.  I know in the movie she falls in love with Eric pretty quickly, but at least she saw him conscious first.  Whereas, here she saves his life and is in love after one look at his comatose face.  So instead of a headstrong, lovesick girl she’s now a crazy stalker who falls in love with possibly dead people?  Great.  The worst thing is, they could have fixed that with one sentence of extra dialogue.  “I saw him dancing and playing the snarffblatt at his birthday party and I knew he was the one, and then I saved his life.” - there.  Also, Eric doesn’t look anything like Eric.  Basically he’s just one more in the long line of drippy, boring princes that OUaT ladies keep inexplicably falling in love with.  At least Belle has some taste.

And then there’s Regina as Ursula.  When I said I memorized the whole movie when I was a kid, that includes all of Ursula’s inflections, and watching Regina try to do the Ursula lip-pop was painful.  Remember the lip-pop, done so amazingly in the cartoon after putting on her shrimp-lipstick?  Or the hip-check so powerful it could propel a man straight to the moon?  No one can out-Ursula Ursula, darling.  Just stop before you hurt yourself.  Also, that whole thing made no sense.  Ursula’s the sea-goddess who’s been dead for a thousand years, but she still arses herself to give mermaids legs for a day?  Pretty active for a dead lady.  Which brings me back to the Echo Cave again - spilling your guts to everyone to get the bridge to appear I can accept, but Neal’s cage was constructed outside the damn cave.  Why does it all of a sudden work by the cave’s stupid rules?  I’m a firm believer that you can pretty much put whatever you want in a story if you make the effort to ensure it fits.  As long as things make sense within the bounds of your own world-building and continuity, go nuts.  Its alright to have a McGuffin if you spend some time building up the McGuffin.  Yes, I’m talking about mermaids being able to travel in between realms.  That is a concept I would have been just fine accepting, if the writers had spent just a little time establishing it.  Something a little more than Rumps saying “Yes, I know that’s a thing they do”.  Really, OUaT?  You are willing to spend god knows how much time noodling over various characters “secrets” but can’t be arsed to properly write in something as important as a way to frikkin’ leave Neverland?  Good god.

Like I said, I don’t watch this show for the amazing writing.  Jane Espenson pretty much has a lockdown on the good episodes, of which there is a non-zero number.  But when its bad… it feels like the show has just dick-slapped us all across the face and didn’t even bother with the foreplay because it knows we’ll never leave it.  Which, lets face it, as long as Robert Carlyle keeps getting scenes, I won’t.  Because I’m weak.  Oh, one more thing - IT IS NOT A SALAD TRIDENT IT IS A DINGLEHOPPER.

Monday, May 20, 2013

Interlude: I Hope You Like Spoilers


I'm not sure what it says about a creative endeavor when one can't decide whether its brilliant or the worst possible thing ever.  That's how I feel about both Star Trek: Into Darkness and the Dr. Who season finale.  It is very confusing.

I suppose I'm cheating on my original idea for this blergblog thing in that I'm not talking about games right now.  I suppose I could point out that neither of the intellectual properties I'm talking about have (to my knowledge) a video game tie-in that isn't rubbish.  Seriously, has there ever been a Star Trek game that didn't suck?  And how exactly would the mechanics of a Dr. Who game work?  I want to say it would have to be a point-and-click adventure game but really most Dr. Who stories involve a lot of deus ex machina and not a whole lot of logic.  Case in point is one of my very favorite episodes - "New Earth" - where the Doctor uses pouches of Kool-Aid to cure a bunch of vat-grown humans of every known disease.  Now that I think about it, that sounds very point-and-click adventure-y and I would play the hell out of that game.  Someone get on that.

By the way... SPOILERS.  Spoilers for all things.  There are going to be spoilers EVERYWHERE.  I'll separate Star Trek spoilers from Dr. Who spoilers with the caps lock but after this sentence is done I take no responsibility whatsoever.  Leave now to remain unspoiled.

**BEGIN STAR TREK SPOILERS**

Remember when it was announced that Benedict Cummerbach was going to be a villain in the new Star Trek movie who "totally wasn't Khan"?  And then the whole Internet rolled its eyes because Mr. Cummerbach already plays a super-intelligent sociopath on the BBC and who the hell else would he be cast as?  And let me get one thing out in the open right away - I really did enjoy the movie.  It was a lot of fun and there were a couple moments where I was stifling squeals of fangirl-ish joy.  The gripes I have are pretty negligible in the grand scheme of how much fun I had.

To recap, at the end of the last movie it was established that the characters we knew and loved had been set on an alternate path because of interference from Nero and Future Spock.  As far as reboot concepts go, I am actually behind this one.  The fact that a huge event (Vulcan's destruction) happened changed all the characters in subtle ways, enabling the actors to put their own stamp on their roles without completely ticking off a huge loyal fanbase.

Its pretty obvious to me that the character who's changed the most is Spock.  Which makes sense - it was his home planet that was destroyed after all.  He still struggles with his emotions, but I feel like he lets his human side show more as a way to honor the mother he lost.  I am on board with that.  I even accepted him kissing Uhura on the transporter pad.  His home was dead, you can't judge a man for needing a little comforting.  What I am not ok with is making Zachary Quinto yell "KHAAAAAAAAAN!!"  No.  I wish I could erase my memory of that moment.  It worked when the Shat did it because he is William Shatner and melodrama is what he spreads on his toast in the morning.  He eats scenery for lunch.  This is all right and proper.  That moment was an icon and trying to replicate it made me laugh uncontrollably.  I don't think that was the emotional response it was intended to inspire.

Let's talk about the scene for a moment.  I have a freakish memory for movie and television plotlines, which may be one of the reasons I'm so on the fence about this movie.  The last time I watched The Wrath of Khan was about two years ago, but I remember Spock's death scene with absolute clarity, to the point where I could probably rattle off the whole dialogue if I thought about it hard enough.  And Spock's death scene is lifted very nearly intact and re-created in "Into Darkness" with Kirk being the one who dies.  There were whole bits of dialogue from that scene in "The Wrath of Khan" that are used unaltered.  The camera shot where (originally) Kirk realizes that the ship is saved and then looks over to Spock's empty chair?  That's there-ish.  Scotty yelling about how opening the door will "Flood the whole compartment".  Yep.  The list goes on.  And I honestly don't know how to feel about it.  Is it a brilliant tribute or lazy directing?  I really can't decide. Without committing to either opinion I will say it was an interesting reversal and it made sense for Kirk's character to finally realize that being a ship captain wasn't just whizzing around space and sleeping with cat-alien twins.

But Kirk's "death" felt a little cheap to me.  In The Wrath of Khan, Spock's death felt final.  And it took a whole entire movie for him to come back.  But that can't happen here because Kirk is human - he can't mind-meld with anyone to pass along his katra and as my sister pointed out its not like the creators would actually let Captain Kirk die for real.  They wouldn't be able to make any more movies.  So I there was kind of a lack of suspense.  You knew that Kirk would live, but you didn't know exactly how.  By the way....

Dr. McCoy saves him with a tribble.  And Khan's magic blood.  In case you thought there weren't enough spoilers already.  So, did I enjoy the movie?  Yes, yes I did.  But I feel confused and a little bit guilty for enjoying it.  There were more than a few genuinely awesome moments, but I really feel like it could have been better.  And the "KHAAAAN!" thing.  As the 10th Doctor would say - stop.  No, just... don't do that.

**END STAR TREK SPOILERS, BEGIN DR. WHO SPOILERS**

You may call me the Mistress of Segue.

The current season of Dr. Who has been an exercise in disappointment for me.  It took me forever to accept Matt Smith as the Doctor, but eventually I did because A Doctor is eternally better than No Doctor.  And there are some genuinely amazing bits about the 11th Doctor's run.  The reason I fell in love with Dr. Who was because it embraces whimsy and optimism so whole-heartedly that there could be an episode where the Doctor saves the universe with a kettle and a bit of string (see what I did there?) and you would be so starry-eyed and in love that you wouldn't care that it didn't make a lick of sense.  The starry-eyed optimism is not present for me in this season, but the not-making-sense has definitely stuck around.  In short, this season has been promises crushed by disappointment every step of the way.

"Dinosaurs on a Spaceship"!!!  How could that ever possibly suck?  By being boring.  Which is what it was.

"Journey to the Center of the TARDIS"!!!  No, there is no way this could be bad.  Finding out what was in the TARDIS this whole time?  And yet, it was not good.

Neil Gaiman is writing another episode?!?  About Cybermen??!  Be still my thumping heart, surely this will save the Doctor from this horrendous pit of mediocrity.

Cue the sobbing.  Other than a few good moments, Neil Gaiman has written something that I did not like.    My heart is broken into a trillion tiny pieces.

So I didn't have very high hopes for the season finale.  And while I would like to say that it blew my mind and my faith is restored, that would not be the truth.  Let's bullet-point this nonsense.

1)  The villain.  I had to look up The Great Intelligence because I was certain that someone who had so much enmity for the Doctor that he was willing to destroy himself to kill the Doctor couldn't be just a side character.  Who was this Great Intelligence and why was he so upset?  Turns out the Great Intelligence has met the Doctor exactly twice.  Once in the Christmas special of this year and once back in 1968-era Who.  And he was willing to burn up his own existence for the satisfaction of foiling the Doctor over and over again?

2) The Impossible Girl.  The explanation behind Clara was so neat I could practically see the bow wrapped around it.  And while I kind of liked the sequences where they inserted her into old footage from the 60's and 70's in the end I felt let down.  It felt like everything was explained but nothing was explained.  The inside of the Doctor's timestream is a ruined planet?  The Doctor doesn't have a corpse (he's had loads of bodies), his remains are a hole in time?  Does Clara get out of his timestream?  Did he just jump into his own corpse?  The non-sense-making has reached a critical mass at this point.

3)  John Hurt.  Don't get me wrong, John Hurt is an amazing actor.  But his aesthetic in the finale illustrated something I didn't want to have to admit.  The whimsy and optimism and sense of wonder is going away.  John Hurt as the Doctor looks sad and tired and run down and his tragedy appears to be catching up with him.  That's not the Doctor I want.  I'm not even asking for Tilda Swinton, though that would be amazing.  Please let me have the illogical optimism.

4) River Song.  What was going on with her in this episode?  Was she a ghost, was she still living in the Library?  Nobody can see her but the door can hear her saying the Doctor's name?  I'm going to go on record here and say I really don't like her as a character.  "Forest of the Dead" was such a good episode and the part where the Doctor says that time can be rewritten and she says "Not those times.  Not one line.  Don't you dare." is simply heart-wrenching.  But when she comes back in the 11th Doctor's run nearly every time she opens her mouth I want to throw her off a cliff.  The smug smiling and the "Spoilers" and the "Hello Sweetie" and the guns... AGH I can't even.

All that being said, there were some moments I did appreciate.  Jenny saying in a panic "Ma'am I think I've been murdered" choked me up, and Strax is just the best thing in the world.  The Whispermen were incredibly scary as well.  Stephen Moffat comes up with some of the most amazing monsters I have ever seen, I'll give him that.  But that's just not enough.  This is really more vitriolic than I originally intended but that is because I love Dr. Who so much and it is seriously hurting my soul to see it so bland and mediocre.  I only have one thing to say about the 50th Anniversary special... Please, David Tennant, bring your glorious sticky-uppey hair back and save this thing that I love.  And don't be the meta-crisis Doctor.